The Ultimate Receive Antenna

This post is about a Large Loop On Ground (LLOG) receive antenna.

I have, for some time, been lamenting the demise of my K9AY antenna last year. While I don’t spend a lot of time Shortwave Listening these days, it is sometimes a nice diversion on a rainy day.

I have been reading about LOG (Loop on Ground) broadband receive antennas for a few years and the concept sounds interesting. Loop antennas in general, tend to reject RF noise better than dipole or vertical ground plane type receivers.

The idea is the loop antennas are more H field (magnetic) than E field (electrical) receivers. Most unintentional RF noise generators create noise in the E field.

Near Field vs. Far Field Electro-Magnetic energy

Additionally, close proximity to the ground further lowers E field noise due to capacitive coupling with the ground. The ground acting as a sink for the E field noise. Loops also tend to have better rejection of chaotic Near Field energy. Thus the combination of those three things will create slightly lower signal with much better signal to noise ratios over traditional up in the air antennas.

The downside is that it cannot be used for transmitting. The capacitive coupling noted above will quickly dissipate all of the transmitted RF into ground as heat.

The LOG antenna that most amateur radio operators use is either or close to the antenna outlined by Matt, KK4JY: The Loop on Ground Antenna

That is all well and good, but I want something larger to go down through the entire Medium Frequency band in into Low Frequency range. The main reason is I want to start fooling around with the 2200 and 630 meter amateur radio bands. Also, wanting a good low noise AM broadcast receive antenna. With that in mind, I began taking inventory of available real estate and parts.

As for real estate; I own a patch of woods behind my house that is approximately 200 x 200 feet. Good enough for a fairly large square loop. The good thing about particular plot of land is it is far away from the neighbors, the utility lines and other sources of electrical noise.

As for the available parts; it turns out I had almost everything needed. The only thing I needed to purchase is a water tight outdoor enclosure for the matching transformer, from Amazon for $9.00.

Here is a list of items used:

ItemAmountUseCommentCost if new
Wire, 14 AWG470 feet (143.26 M)Wire LoopPieced together from left overs$100.00 (500 ft spool) at Home Depot
Toroid, BN-73-2021Transformer coreLeft over$0.95 at Amidon
Wire, 26 AWG magnet wire18 inches (46 cm)Transformer windingLeft over$9.00 (2 oz) at Amazon
Coax Cable, Cablewave FCC38-50J175 feet (53.34 M)Transmission line to houseSalvaged from decommissioned AM directional$53.00 (500 ft spool RG-6) at Home Depot
RF Connector, type N Female1Antenna outputFound in junk drawer$6.00 (6ea) F chassis mount at Amazon
Enclosure, ABS water tight IP673.9 x 3.9 x 3 inch
(9.9 x 9.9 x 7.62 cm)
Transformer housingPurchased from Amazon$9.00 at Amazon

The wire is copper THHN 14 gauge. If buying new, this is the single largest expense. I soldered and heat shrunk several lengths from left overs on spools. This antenna is going to be in the shade, so I don’t have to worry too much about UV degradation of the insulation. If that happens, I can find some more insulated wire.

The big bonus is the Cablewave FCC38-50J phase stabilized cable, most of which is buried out to my old K9AY antenna, I simply extended it about 50 feet. Having the line already buried to much of the manual labor out of the project. The buried section of line acts as an RF choke, fully eliminating any electrical noise coming from my house at the antenna side of the line.

Large Loop On Ground antenna, installed in woods behind my house

I did have to go around and clear away some brush and dead trees along where the antenna wire was laid on the ground. I wanted to make sure that the wire was directly on or within an inch or two of the ground.

LLOG antenna transformer and transmission line

The transformer took about 20 minutes to construct. It consists of six windings on the antenna side and two windings on the transmission line side. I used a type 73 core because I am more interested in the medium frequency range. It seems to work well up to about 15 MHz. The transformer is for galvanic isolation, keeping the loop current balanced and separated from the transmission line. The shield is not grounded at the antenna side, but is grounded where it comes into the house. On the transformer enclosure, I used a salvaged N connector to match what I had for the transmission line. Any low loss cable, including RG-6 or RG-11 will work very well.

WKNY signal, 18 miles distant from transmitter

After a few hours of low intensity work, I had everything together. I connected the antenna to my trusty Kenwood R-2000 receiver and tuned to the nearest Class C AM on 1,490 KHz. Wow! What a difference! This little 1 KW high band station 18.6 miles (30 km) away barely came in before, especially when the ground is dried out. The relative signal strength meter on the receiver shows an S9+5. I am located on the edge of the predicted 0.5 mV/M contour while the spectrum analyzer shows a -65 dB signal, which is netting a 44 dB SNR, which is very good. All of this is after a Mini Circuits ZSC-4-2 power divider, which has an insertion loss of -6 dB per port.

Wide view of the entire AM band, about 1pm

One of the reasons for the “decline of AM;” overcrowding. This was taken during the daytime, when there was no skywave propagation. Barely an open frequency.

With the spectrum analyzer and made a few interesting discoveries. First, the noise floor in the Medium Frequency range goes from about -100 to -110 depending on the frequency. The noise floor on High Frequency is -112 or lower across the entire band. I clearly get all of the NYC AM stations as well as most of the stations in and around Albany. Before sunrise, I tuned around the 630 (472 to 479 KHz) meter band and heard a few stations sending CW (W4TS @ 164 miles (264 KM), K2ORS @ 157.2 miles (253 KM)). A few overnights of WSPR monitoring on 475.6 KHz netted 194 spots from 11 different stations. The furthest was 822 miles (1,322 KM) away in central Illinois. All of these stations are transmitting 5 watts EIRP or less.

LLOG 72 Hour WSPR reception map

This antenna works well to about 15 MHz, where the signals start to drop off because of the transformer material that I used.

Using the Network Analyzer, I found the resonance is 2.865 MHz with a -36 dB return loss. This makes sense, as the wire laying on the ground will have a lower velocity factor due to the capacitive coupling with the earth. In this case the VF of the antenna is 73% when the soil is dry. The velocity factor should go down when the ground gets wet, or covered with snow.

It might be interesting to do some ground conductivity measurements…

Happy Independence Day, Patriot!

First of all, I have received a few off line questions about my well being due to the absence of posts recently. I assure you, I am fine. I am really busy with a variety of projects, most of which cannot be blogged about due to restrictions from station owners.

Secondly, I hope that all are staying safe in this current heat wave, which is effecting a large part of the country.

Finally, my country is celebrating its 250th birthday. In my youth, I was lucky to have traveled around many areas in Asia. It was an eye opening experience because I was not visiting tourist destinations. It made me thoroughly understand how important our constitution is. That experience also taught me how important it is to take action and participate in governance.

How?

Vote.

Voter apathy has lead to some of the worst election outcomes in history. In New York City, Zohran Mamdani received 573,000 votes in the primary and 1,114,184 votes in the general election. In the 2025 New York City Mayoral election 2,174,547 people cast a vote. There are 4,960,233 active registered voters in New York City. That means that 43% of registered voters showed up and 22% of registered voters elected Mamdani the Commie. That is a problem; 22% is not a mandate under any system, yet here we are.

If you think your vote doesn’t count, you are wrong. If you do not like the candidates, register for a party and vote in the primary. If you think you can do a better job, run for office. There are many ways to become meaningfully engaged in the election process. Go (or watch on line) town board meetings. Ask questions, call your local representatives and so forth.

COEXIST?

A story about skirted AM towers and Cellular carriers.

Skirted AM tower with cellular equipment

We take care of a few sites that have skirted AM towers with Cellular equipment installed. For the first few years, all was well. The cell carriers put up their equipment under supervision and we made sure that the AM station’s antenna still was working when the were finished. At some point, things changed.

Stiff arm hitting skirt wire

It is a little bit hard to see because the camera is focused on the foreground and not the background, but the stiff arm from the cell carrier sector is shorting the skirt wire to the tower.

More often then not these days, tower crews show up unannounced and start working on the tower. I had a call from a client their station being off the air only to arrive on site and find a crew on the tower with the AM skirt grounded by a set of battery jumper cables. The ground crew said they kept getting shocked by the wire so they grounded it.

In other cases, they show up, do the work and leave before anybody notices. Then, at some point somebody checks the AM transmitter readings and sees a problem.

AM skirt wire, shorting against mounting bracket

In another situation, the tower crew came and installed new equipment. They installed an insulating sleeve around the skirt wire (while the transmitter was on) but did not secure it well enough. The eventually, sleeve slipped down the wire and it shorted. No one, not even the tower owner, knew about the tower crew being on the tower.

AM skirt wire insulating sleeve

Same tower, the sleeve on this wire rotated around so that the opening was facing the stiff arm causing a large charred, melted plastic area.

These were repaired with some left over coax-seal and electrical tape. After this, I was able to retune the ATU using my network analyzer.

The only solution, it seems, is to put up more cameras with motion detection notification so when somebody shows up unannounced the station will at least know about it.

Designing filters for 630 meters

This has nothing to do with broadcasting. It does, however, have a good deal of geeky goodness.

I have started a new project, getting on the air on the 630 meter Amateur band. For those who do not know, 630 meters is from 472–479 kHz which is below the AM (or Standard) broadcast band. It was formerly part of the Maritime Mobile allocation. For US Amateurs, these frequencies were added in 2017 so it is a relatively new experience.

There is no commercially available equipment for this band, so it depends on the potential operator to make his or her own equipment which is where the fun begins.

To start, I thought I’d repurpose a WSPR beacon to 630 meters to do some antenna experimentation. Like all transmitters, the output of this unit needs to be filtered to reduce or eliminate out of band emissions. The Amateur radio service falls under Part 97, which has somewhat different requirements than Part 73 or 74.

47CFR 97.307(d) states:

For transmitters installed after January 1, 2003, the mean power of any spurious emission from a station transmitter or external RF power amplifier transmitting on a frequency below 30 MHz must be at least 43 dB below the mean power of the fundamental emission.

That is a fairly low bar. I am going to shoot for something better. WSPR beacons center around 475.6 kHz. The harmonics are at 951, 1428, 1902, 2378, 2853, 3329, 3804, 4280 and 4756 KHz. The first two are in the AM broadcast band. A quick look at the Zachtek WSPR beacon show these harmonics:

unfiltered ZackTek WSPR Desktop transmitter, 630 meter band

Definitely does not meet the out of band emissions standard set forth in FCC 97.307. Typical of solid state amplifiers, the odd harmonics are greater than the even.

I used a filter design program called Elsie to design suitable filters for 630 Meters. There are two types of filters that can attenuate the harmonics; low pass and band pass. A low pass filter passes all emissions below the cutoff.

630 Meter low pass filter

That is fine, however, it does not eliminate the possibility of interference and inter- modulation from frequencies below the band. Both types of filters are also good for receivers in the presence of AM broadcast band towers, which can desensitize receiver front ends when located nearby.

A band pass filter cuts off frequencies above and below the pass band.

630 Meter band pass filter

This is a nodal inductor-coupled band pass filter. I like this design because it has deep shoulders and has better performance with the harmonics in the AM broadcast band.

Prototype low pass filter:

630 Meter Low Pass Filter

Quick prototype board. Capacitors are Cornell Dubilier silver mica dipped, the inductors are wound on T130-3 material. The SWR and return loss:

Smith chart:

The Smith chart shows that it is slightly inductive on the desired frequency. The way to mitigate is to either add some capacitance (not easy) or reduce the inductance (somewhat easier). I tried tuning it by changing the spacing on the windings of L1 and L2. There was no change.

Low pass filter response:

The second harmonic on 951 KHz is -58.37 dBc. Harmonics 3 – 7 are 40 dB below the fundamental. This is adequate but the band pass filter below is better.

Prototype band pass filter:

630 Meter band pass filter prototype

The above filter is a little rough, but it was a good test of the filter program’s design parameters. The capacitors are Cornell Dubilier 0.02 uF 500V. The inductors are wound on T130-3 iron powder toroid cores. The results are good:

630 Meter band pass smith chart

By adjusting the spacing of the windings on L3 (center of the board), I can tune the VSWR and Return loss for best values.

The same ZachTek WSPR transmitter noted above, running through the prototype filter:

ZachTek 630 Meter band pass filter response

The second harmonic on 951 KHz is -62.86 dBc. The rest of the harmonics are less than that.

Of the two, the band pass filter has better performance characteristics. The return loss/SWR is lower and can be tuned by adjusting the spacing of the toroid windings on L3.

I decided to take the next step and make a PCB. I have KiCad on my Linux machine, which works well. Sometimes some of the foot prints need to be edited so the dimensions are correct, but that is easy.

KiCad design 630 meter band pass filter

What I like about this board design is that it will work on any amateur band below 7 MHz with different component values. I had five boards fabricated and built one of them out. The T130-3 toroids are wound with 14 AWG magnet wire. The capacitors are same used in the prototype, 0.02 uF, 500V mica dipped.

Cleaned up band pass filter board

Board mounted in aluminum enclosure:

Band pass filter mounted in diecast aluminum enclosure

This build has similar measurements to the prototype board above. Based on what I found while making this, I made a few tweaks to the circuit board in KiCad. I would consider selling these, if there is enough interest.